Three Thoughts on Kramer's "Think Tank" Idea

If you haven't read the Threatpost article "U.S. Needs Cybersecurity Skunk Works, Expert Says" yet, then take a minute to do so. Go ahead, I'll wait.

Ok, back? Cool...

I have 3 responses to this article:
1) A "think tank" could be interesting, especially if implemented using the same biz model as In-Q-Tel uses.
2) If done, the government cannot be in charge of it in any way, shape, or form. Participate? Sure, but not in charge. Otherwise, it would be a complete, abject failure.
3) "policy makers and security experts don't even know which questions to ask, let alone what the correct answers are" - Ummm, well, let's see... sure, policy makers are clueless, but perhaps he's not talking to the right "security experts," because I'd like to think a number of us actually know the right questions...

Overall, I'm unsurprised by the lack of clue, but am still a bit disappointed. And this was the keynote speaker for Black Hat DC today. Oh, well...

Added bonus quote: "a wonk-geek coalition" - seriously? *rolls eyes*

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Ben Tomhave published on January 18, 2011 1:32 PM.

Announcing BSides Austin 2011: Keep Security Weird! was the previous entry in this blog.

What's the Point of Conferences? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Monthly Archives

Pages

  • about
Powered by Movable Type 6.3.7